Why BREEZE?Question
Quality, innovation, expertise & a lot more. MORE

Trainingtraining
Training on model fundamentals and real world applications. MORE | UPCOMING

Special Offersspecial
Special AERMOD, training, and data offers.
MORE

Purchase BREEZEonline
Same day delivery on many software and data products.  SALES | PRICING

BREEZE ROADS Models

Most mobile source dispersion models predict air pollution concentrations near roadways resulting from motor vehicles traveling under free-flow conditions. BREEZE ROADS is an enhanced version of the CALINE4, CAL3QHC, and CAL3QHCR series of models that incorporates methods for estimating queue lengths and the contribution from idling vehicles. So what is each model capable of? Find out more below.

CALINE4 is a line source air quality model developed by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). It is based on the Gaussian diffusion equation and employs a mixing zone concept to characterize pollutant dispersion over the roadway.

The purpose of the model is to assess air quality impacts near transportation facilities. Given source strength, meteorology and site geometry, CALINE4 can predict pollutant concentrations for receptors located within 500 meters of the roadway. In addition to predicting concentrations of relatively inert pollutants such as carbon monoxide (CO), the model can predict nitrogen dioxide (N02) and suspended particle concentrations. It also has special options for modeling air quality near intersections, street canyons, and parking facilities.

Historically, the CALINE series of models required relatively minimal input from the user. Spatial and temporal arrays of wind direction, wind speed and diffusivity were not needed by the models. While CALINE4 uses more input parameters than its predecessors, it must still be considered an extremely easy model to implement. For most applications, optional inputs can be bypassed and many other inputs can be assigned assumed worst case values. More complex approaches to dispersion modeling are unnecessary for most applications because of the uncertainties in estimating emission factors and traffic volumes for future years.

CALINE4's accuracy is well balanced with the accuracy of state-of-the-art predictive models for emissions and traffic. The model also possesses greater flexibility than earlier versions at little cost to the user in terms of input complexity.

CALINE4 should be thought of as an updated and expanded version of CALINE3. While the models use different methods for developing their vertical and horizontal dispersion curves, the final results differ very little by air quality modeling standards. For the most part, the technical differences between the two models represent "fine tuning" of the Gaussian method (as applied to line source modeling) and the mixing zone model. The real differences between the two models are in the areas of improved input / output flexibility and expanded capabilities.